Written by Paul Craig Roberts,

TruePublica, a UK site that skirted the 9/11 issue, was full of ignorant journalists from the BBC, the Huffington Post and other propagandists from the military / security complex. The constant and acute reluctance of experts and distinguished personalities who have asked questions about official history has convinced TruePublica that skeptics who need so much screaming must make sense.

the The media NEVER EXAMINED the evidence or explained the analysis provided by scientists, architects, engineers, pilots and first responders who experienced the explosion of the twin towers of the World Trade Center. The media have never asked for the publication of several videos that recorded everything that hit the Pentagon. The media have never investigated whether cell phones were operating in 2001 at the altitudes to which the official story claimed to have been called.

Two-bit punk proxies, such as Chris Bell of the BBC, Jess Brammer and Chris York of the Huffington Post, call the experts "conspiracy" for their knowledge and integrity. They knowingly use a term concealed by the CIA. his media means to discredit the skeptical experts of the Warren Commission report on the assassination of President Kennedy.

The fact that carefully presented evidence is NEVER COMMITTED EXCEPT NAME APPEAL is a strong indication that the evidence is true and can not be rebutted.

TruePublica is such an important site that, in its own words, it "does not even publish news from RT," a much more reliable source of information than the BBC, CNN or Good Medical. However, TruePublica understood that after 18 years, an ad hominum attack remains the only defense of the official story. The official account has no proof whatsoever. It relies entirely on avoidance of evidence and unverified assertions.

The 9/9 lawyers' committee was able to obtain approval from the US District Attorney for New York South District to "comply with the provisions of the 18 United States of America". 3332 ", which requires the convening of a federal grand jury to examine the unexamined evidence of 9/11, convinced TruePublica no American lawyer would summon a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Unquestionable evidence has been presented to the United States Attorney.

Clearly, Washington expects the Department of Justice to escape the task imposed by the lawyers' committee, an escape that proxy media will help and encourage. Nevertheless, this escape will likely reinforce public opinion that the government fears evidence and will probably not follow them more than in the case of the assassination of President Kennedy, the assassination of Robert Kennedy , the Israeli attack against the USS Liberty and a large number of other crimes officially concealed.

More and more people will realize that calling hominum ad names is not an acceptable answer to the evidence.

Some interesting new information on September 11th

TruePublica.org.uk

TruePublica Editor: We have hardly published anything on September 11 on TruePublica. When independent media outlets do so, they are immediately referred to as conspiracy theorists by the mainstream media and by the "fact checkers". The BBC explains this precisely in a 2018 article that begins:

"On September 11, 2001, radical Islamist terrorists hijacked four passenger planes – nearly 3,000 people were killed when the plane was flown into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a Pennsylvania field. Just hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers in New York, a conspiracy theory appeared online and persists more than 16 years later. "

The whole article is devoted to all the "conspiracy theories" involved in 9/11 and makes fun of anyone or anything that questions the government's official line. They even mock the brother of a man killed in the 9/11 attacks and, frankly, the BBC report is disgusting enough to read.

And yet, we are there all these years later and it is not surprising that conspiracy theories continue.

A 2016 study by Chapman University in California found that more than half of Americans thought the government was hiding information about the September 11 attacks. This is partly because large parts of the US government's official report have been expunged for years – and are still missing.

The big problem is that the government is hiding crucial evidence. And then there is another proof that the state and the mainstream media refuse to take into account.

Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist and former US Under Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under the presidency of President Reagan. Roberts was associate editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week. He received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993, the Forbes Media Guide ranked him among the top seven journalists in the United States.

Roberts wrote a few days ago this really interesting information about which the traditional media have been completely silent:

"Although the United States is supposedly a democracy with the rule of law, it took 17 years of public pressure to carry out the first 9/11 grand jury investigation. Based on the work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth led by Richard Gage, first aid organizations and pilots, books by David Ray Griffin and others, and eyewitness accounts , 11/9 Investigation Counsel Committee Provided Sufficient Evidence to US District Attorney for New York South District to Constrain Him to Comply with the Federal Law Requiring the Calling of a Grand Jury Federal Government to investigate for the first time the attacks of 11 September 2001. https: // www. avocatscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org

This puts the US Department of Justice in an extraordinary position. The US Attorney's Office will be under enormous pressure to have the grand jury dismiss the evidence as a theory of the antipatriotic plot or another maneuver aimed at discrediting the evidence presented by the lawyers' committee or altering the official narrative without totally discrediting it.

"What the advocates of September 11 and the lawyers' committee have managed to do is destroy the designation of 9/11 skeptics as" conspiracy theorists ". No American lawyer would summon a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Evidently, the evidence is convincing that has placed the US Attorney in an unenviable position. "

If the lawyers' committee and the 9/11 observers trust the American lawyer to stick to the facts, the grand jury will have little effect. If the United States had a rule of law, something as serious as 9/11 could not have passed 17 years without investigation. "

Three weeks before Roberts made this statement, Off-Guardian had published a letter about a Huffington Post success story about college journalism. Its first paragraph fully explains its own position.

"HuffPost UK may reveal that journalism students teaching in one of Britain's top universities have publicly supported long-discredited conspiracy theories about the September 11th terrorist attack."

This article, like that of the BBC, vigorously attacks any individual or organization that has the temerity to question the "official" account of any major incident presented by the state, such as the Skripal poisonings, the chemical weapons of the Syria, Iraq and Iraq. Chilcot report.

HuffPost even uses a former unidentified leader of MI6 and a former Supreme Commander of NATO to dispel such disputes from this narrative, then attacks other sources of information such as RT as a Russian propaganda independent of the source. In general, TruePublica does not publish news from RT, but that does not make any propaganda of its contents.

David Ray Griffin, an American professor and retired political writer, founded the Center for Process Studies, which seeks to promote the common good through the relational approach found in the process. The co-author of the book & # 39; 9/11 Unmasked & # 39; – Part of the attack piece was centered on the hit HuffPost.

The other co-author, the chairman of the panel on September 11, responded to HuffPost. For information, the objective of the Consensus Group is "to provide an immediate source of evidence-based research for any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia or any other organization or organization. institution of investigation ".

This letter is as follows:

Jess Brammer, UK Huffington Post
Chris York, United Kingdom Huffington Post

Dear Mrs. Brammar and Mr. York,

I have been a Senior Information Specialist serving the Medical Officers of Health of British Columbia, Canada, for 25 years.

Your article on Professor Piers Robinson and the scholarly work of Dr. David Ray Griffin is the least accurate and mediocre article that I have ever published.

I attended Dr. Griffin with 10 of his investigative books on the events of September 11th. In 2011, we decided to create the September 11 International Consensus Group to review and evaluate the official statements related to September 11, 2001. The Working Group we formed has 23 members, including representatives from the fields of physics, chemistry, engineering construction and aeronautical engineering. , piloting, investigation of aircraft accidents, medicine, journalism, psychology and religion.

In seeking a consensual methodology, the former British Columbia Provincial Epidemiologist advised me to use a leading model used in medicine to establish the best diagnostic and treatment data that can guide physicians around the world in their work. help with consensus statements.

The expert group methodology produced, seven years later, 51 rebuttals of official statements, published in the 911 Unmasked document: Survey conducted by an international review panel in September 2018.https: // www .amazon.com / 11-Unmasked-International- Exam-Investigation / dp / 1623719747

Panel members conducted three rounds of reviews and comments on each consensus point, which is now a chapter of this book. The panelists were blind to each other throughout the process, providing an uninfluenced individual feedback. All points that did not receive the 85% approval in the third round were set aside.

Among the honorary members of the group of experts include the late British Parliament (and the oldest), Michael Meacher, the late evolutionary biologist, Lynn Margulis, and the late honorary president of the Italian Supreme Court, Ferdinando Imposimato.

The Huffington Post has drastically lowered its criteria for publishing this success, and what prompted it to do so is an issue worthy of consideration.
Yours sincerely,
Elizabeth Woodworth, co-author with Dr. David Ray Griffin of 9/11 unmasked

TruePublica continues:

It is now more than 18 years since the 9/11 event, which changed the world, has changed. One wonders when the information held by the US government will continue to anger so many affected people.

However, one of the reasons for the persistence of such issues is precisely that of the actions of the US government itself. We must not forget these so-called "conspiracy theories" that have materialized and continue to pour gasoline on the flames of doubt.

For example, the US government killed thousands of people by poisoning alcohol to prove that alcohol was bad for the general public during Prohibition. It was a "conspiracy theory" that lasted for decades – until proven. https://Good Medical/technology/2010/02/the-little-told-tory-of-how-the-u-s-government-poisoned-alcool-during-prohibition.html

Then you can make your choice among the lies that the government says when it comes to triggering wars – how about the lie that Saddam Hussein and Iraq had weapons of mass destruction ready to shoot on Western targets. The total number of deaths exceeded 1 million. Another classic American lie is the Tonkin Gulf incident in August 1964, used as a pretext to intensify the country's involvement in the Vietnam War, which killed 60,000 American soldiers. The total number of deaths reached 1.35 million, all based on a lie. This incident is due solely to the unintentional declassification of an NSA record in 2005.

Edward Snowden proved by his revelations in 2013 that the government was spying on everyone while he had denied having already done so. It took a whistleblower to let us know. The highest courts in the country have concluded that the UK government has violated many privacy and oversight laws due to mass civilian surveillance systems.

The Mockingbird Operation was a US government operation in which journalists were paid to publish CIA propaganda, revealed only by the Watergate scandal. It took a thief to unknowingly capture secret documents and recordings for the public to discover.

The list goes on and on – just as 9/11 will be, so it will be interesting to see how the US prosecutor, presented with the evidence of so many prominent professionals, will bury even more evidence from the 9th. / 11. However, do not hold your breath, the same questions will arise again in 18 years.